Friday, October 17, 2014

Winners vs. Losers?

Stiggins' article on the assessment crisis and assessment through the student's eyes bring attention to very important ideas that policy makers and even us as teachers may overlook when we are creating and implementing our assessments.  He explains that politicians are not exposed to the every day demands of the classroom, which results in standards that are difficult to apply to every student due to the diversity of every classroom.  One idea that really caught my attention was that assessment can create this idea of winners and losers among the student.  Students are continuing to build off of their classroom accomplishments and produce "winning streaks," while other students fall behind more and more as time goes on. From the high achieving students' perspective, what they are asked of in class makes sense to them right off the bat, it's like second nature to them.  On the other hand, there are struggling students who feel puzzled, are discouraged by the continual evidence of their failures, and do not feel motivated or able to learn.  Stiggins argues that this must be combated through more attention to the individual abilities and needs of students as well as finding ways to help students turn failure into success.  He also mentions that it can be very beneficial to have students to participate in the assessment process so that they are well-informed about what is expected of them and are able to build confidence through the tasks they are asked to do.

Another idea that stood out to me was Stiggins' mention of assessment being used as an intimidator in the classroom.  I personally remember in my middle and high school days that I actually was often intimidated by formal assessments, as were my peers around me.  There was always talk about how much everyone was dreading an exam, or how our lives would be over if we got an unsatisfactory grade.  I thankfully got a satisfactory grade on most of my assessments, with the exception of a few classes that I just did not like at all, but now I think of my other classmates who may have not been completely prepared or did not have a solid understanding of the material.  I would imagine that they would fall into the thought process that Stiggins describes through the idea of winners vs. losers in assessment where a student who is continually facing confusion and feelings of failure falls deeper into the cycle of hopelesness, frustration, and loss of motivation.

And so, I would like to know, what ideas do you have for implementing more student-centered assessment in your classrooms that will motivate your students and help them feel able to learn? What roles would you like your students to play in the process? What are some struggles you believe you may encounter with assessment and how do you plan to approach them?

17 comments:

  1. As far as implementing student-centered assessment in the classroom, I liked several of Stiggin's suggestions. I liked the example of looking at both a good essay and a not-so-good essay with the class, reviewing them, and then creating a rubric for their own essay building off strengths from the two essays they compared. I also liked the math example where the teacher had the students review their own test to look for "common errors" or "careless mistakes" in order breakdown an actual grade as opposed to just looking at the "60%" on the test. I think these are all types of assessment methods we should implement into the classroom. Pre-assessment, i.e. look at examples of good work and build a rubric with students, and also post-assessment, break down a final assessment, to see where the true problems really lie.

    ReplyDelete

  2. Claire,

    I think that many students feel frustrated and anxious while they take a standardized test. Depending on how well a student is doing on the test is tied to his/her future success. This made me think of how great of a push the schools have on teachers to test more and more. Even if a student is not doing well, doubling the work will have a positive impact. I’ve wondered many times how well an assessment can measure a student’s understanding of a topic, and that is why differentiating for students is important so each student demonstrates what he/she has learned. There are different types of assessment with different purposes, so implementing assessment for a specific lesson is important. To implement more student-centered assessment would be through rubrics. I think rubrics are beneficial when it comes to know what is expected of a student for a specific task, and also a way for students to assess themselves before turning in the project or whatever it might be. Also portfolios are a great way to see the improvement a student has made whether it is throughout one year or one semester.

    ReplyDelete
  3. Claire, I agree that having students be a part of the assessment process would be very helpful so that they know exactly what is expected from them and they won't feel too disconnected from the assessment. I think that a great way to do this is through the use of rubrics, students can create one as a whole class and they can even assess themselves using the rubric before turning in the assignment. This will also help them know how to get started in their assignments since they have already reviewed expectations. I created one of these self-assess rubrics and I am really looking forward to see how my students grade themselves. Another great point that you made is about assessments being intimidating, and I agree that students who are struggling will be nervous about assessments when they haven't completely understood the material. That's why it's really important that we do the best we can as teachers to make sure that our assessments tell us pretty well where it is that we have to work on more with our students.

    ReplyDelete
  4. Hey Claire-

    I think I will have a lot of issues with assessment. I would love to be able to do more progress based assessment- where students are given grades based on how they have improved, not in comparison to each other. To get students involved in grading I could have them help create the rubric for whatever it is I'm grading. That would give them more agency and help them clearly understand what they are being assessed on. Also, a good rubric would help students where exactly they are falling short, and where they are doing well.

    ReplyDelete
  5. Claire,

    While reading your post I thought about student involvement in assessment and what that looks like. I've talked about this previously in classes with my peers as well as professors. We've discussed the idea that students can help plan assessments with the teacher, one example being helping to build a rubric based on what the students think they should be evaluated on. I think students should have an idea if not a say in how they are evaluated. One way to really prepare students is to design your activities to mirror the assessment (this works well for preparing for summative assessments). This is something I've seen carried out in classrooms and make students feel prepared and responsible for their education.

    ReplyDelete
  6. Hi Claire,
    I think you raised some really good points and the example you brought in from your personal experience with exams in middle school and high school was really on point. I think some ways we can make assessments more student centered are giving students several ways to display their knowledge, and giving them agency as learners, allowing them to be involved in the decision making process. The article also touched on giving students meaningful feedback, so not just a letter grade. This is so crucial because it is the first step towards guiding our students to grow and develop, its telling them "why" and not just what their grade is.

    ReplyDelete
  7. Hi Claire!

    Going along with what Yosra said, a way to make assessments more student centered is giving them options and the agency to showcase their learning. This can be done through a pre-assessment in which you as the teacher find out more about your students. What are their interests, who works well in groups, and who works better alone, what do they dislike about pervious assessments? This can all be done through surveys or just reflections so that you may gain knowledge to create better assessments for the students. This will ultimately make you a better teacher because students will be learning more when they have that interest and sense of agency. What I really liked about one of my favorite teachers is that he would write a detailed response to our big projects assignments. It wasn't just a rubric where he circled the numbers. He gave the time to respond to the students individually, what he liked and what could use some help. This gave me a sense of what to work on next time and at the same time confidence in my abilities.

    ReplyDelete
  8. Yes, I completely relate to your personal experience as test days during middle and high school were those days that we just would not care and guess to be able to get it over with. I really agree with your statement that politicians that are enforcing these laws do not have an educational background so how can we allow them to take charge in our students' lives. I believe as a future educator being able to give students pre-assessments or even self-assessments gives them the ability to really put in their best work. With these two techniques students are able to point out their strengths and weaknesses as a student and be able to address and fix them by the post-assessment. Also rubrics have been teachers best-friend as it explains why it is that students get the grade they get. Students need to know where they stand and what they can do to become a better learner.

    ReplyDelete
  9. Hi, Claire!

    I completely agree with the points you have made here. To answer one of your questions, I think modeling and creating rubrics along with the students is very useful. I also think that allowing the students to monitor their own learning is useful. For example, today I delivered my subject-verb agreement lesson which part of it required students to monitor themselves and their peers as they presented. My goal was to allow them to correct their own mistakes/peer collaboration. According to the exit slip that I gave , 7 out of 8 students got full credit. They told me that it really helped them understand SVA. Small activities like this can help motivate students and assess their own learning.

    ReplyDelete
  10. Hey Claire!

    What you discussed is absolutely spot on about how these assessments, such as standardized tests, make students feel like they are put in categories of "winners" and "losers". Assessments like standardized testing kills students passion to learn in my opinion. It's stressful, makes them feel like losers if they don't do well, and puts a lot of pressure on students to do well in order to get into a good college. Your post actually reminded me of this article I read a while back about a photographer who took a photo of her daughter in kindergarten crying hysterically because she couldn't get all the answers right on homework. It was so heartbreaking for this mom and other parents who see their children be so hard on themselves over assessment. Here's the article!

    http://missourieducationwatchdog.com/a-new-york-and-chicago-mom-discover-what-standardized-rigor-really-means-for-their-children/

    ReplyDelete
  11. I think student centered learning needs to be carefully monitored and balanced. I have been in a few classes, where I believe student centered learning was emphasized too much. It seemed as the teacher was taking a break the whole semester. Student centered learning can be used periodically when there is a difficult concept or detailed material such as the Cold War. The teacher can walk around and listen to students understanding and formulate an assessmen with them.

    ReplyDelete
  12. Heya Claire,

    What ideas do you have for implementing more student-centered assessment in your classrooms that will motivate your students and help them feel able to learn? What roles would you like your students to play in the process? What are some struggles you believe you may encounter with assessment and how do you plan to approach them?

    In response to a couple of your questions...the first being about implementing more student-centered assessments that will motivate students to learn, I think performance tasks that make students quiz/test each other's knowledge seem highly effective (like the ones described in my assigned article, Article 5); having students develop their own rubrics for certain projects/assessments should also help to keep students accountable and make them "owners" of their learning and the work they do. I want students to collaboratively learn as much as possible, which means I want them to play the role of collaborator in assessing each other's work--as peer reviewers and teammates, with everyone essentially on the same team (even if students have to break into groups for competitive games, etc.)

    Also, in response to the article stating that assessments that have a focus on the end result cause intimidation and lack of motivation, I completely agree. (I've mentioned this before in previous comments too!) I think that focusing more on process is key and making assessments more habitual and frequent throughout students' learning process, as well as making them more student-centered, will help wear away at the sense of intimidation that students experience regarding assessments.

    ReplyDelete
  13. Hello. I have to pushback on something. You were always intimidated by formal assessments? From my memory, I never thought much about them. Oh sure, there might be a test about a topic or in a subject that you may not have felt super comfortable about, but you knew that;s how "school rolled". You knew there would be tests. you knew there would be grades, you knew there would be parent teacher conferences, and you even knew there would be nationwide standard assessment tests. There were no "surprises" here. That was "the game", one you had to play whether you liked it or not. (think of Quenton K. Clemens' concept of "necessary evil". I find this incessant whining about testing both amusing and counter-productive. it's not going to change. Let me repeat that. It's not going to change. On the legislative level, you constantly have lawmakers legislate on matter they know NOTHING about - they get lobbied and they have people on their staff who are supposed to be very knowledgeable about certain topic,but they themselves are basically idiots. Life is also full of "formal assessments". As a teacher you will learn this the hard way the next time the principal and the vice principal and others walk into your classroom with clipboards and pens and start making little checkmarks on the basis of what they see. Guess what? they don't see a "student centered classroom" and other little things they want to see? you get marked down. You are being formally assessed. That's life. Life sucks and then you die. I suggest we are better off preparing students for that realization so when they're salespeople and get assessed on the basis of their sales, they won't be shocked and amazed. Or when the person in advertising lands or blows an important account, he/she will be "assessed on that basis. No one is making widgets anymore (though even in that environment, I would suggest how fast one worked along the assembly line and how many screwups they had was also a "formal assessment". Should the students continue their educations, their "formal assessments" won't end anytime soon. They will have the ACT/SATs, then of course they will have GRE's, GMAT's, etc.. they will have to pass the bar exam or a CPA exam, etc etc etc etc. Standardized testing is a fact of life. Better work within the system to improve it. That is why the suggestion of student involvement in assessment process, and a comfort level with what is expected of them is such a great idea. It may not be applicable to broad standardized tests (which are meant to produce a :"bell curve" distribution - that's something one can debate.. but we don't have time for it here) but it can and surely should be used within our own classroom assessment methodology.

    ReplyDelete
  14. I recollect an experience in one of my high school classes where a teacher gave out a self-assessment and asked us to reflect on what grade we should get and why. It was one of the hardest things I had to do because I had to reflect on how I was doing. The majority of us gave ourselves a low grade then she would of given us. I think this would be something that I would implement in one of my classes when I become a teacher.

    ReplyDelete
  15. Claire,

    I anticipate encountering difficulty in my efforts to craft meaningful, differentiated assessments. The prospect of conceiving assessments that somehow measure understanding while also facilitating learning within a diverse group of students is, I think, a daunting one. My plan is to remain responsive to the feedback I receive from my students. Doing so will allow me to design assessments that promise to meet the individual needs of my students without having to sacrifice anything in the way of intellectual rigor.

    ReplyDelete
  16. Claire, you bring up some very important points. I think that one of the biggest issues with assessment is that we assign a mark, a grade to learning and that seems to be the end of it. We have turned a tool of evaluation into the ultimate goal. As long as we have grades we will always get caught up in them and we will not make progress and learning the main goal of education. For me it was so liberating to have graduate classes in which the grade and possible points you could get were not even an issue. I am just sorry it only happened so late in my education.

    ReplyDelete
  17. The points in the article regarding assessment reminded me of my sister who is in high school. She has recently came home very upset because her biology teacher told the class that every student would fail the exam because the test was so hard. As the article states, my sister's teacher used intimidation as a motivator. My sistered learned all the material so she would get an A on the test. She learned the material out of fear, which was an authentic learning situation. After she received the desired grade on the exam, I am sure that she soon forgot the information.

    ReplyDelete

Note: Only a member of this blog may post a comment.